Reproductive health and rights, and public policies in Brazil: revisiting challenges during covid-19 pandemics.
Carmen Simone Grilo DinizCristiane da Silva CabralPublished in: Global public health (2021)
We revisit the debates on reproductive health and rights (RHR) and public policies in Brazil, with focus on contraception, abortion and maternity care. These were part of a broader political agenda for re-democratisation, and for health sector reform, with the creation of the Women's Integral Health Program (PAISM) in 1983, and of the Universal Health System (SUS) in 1988. The momentum created by ICPD in Cairo (1994) was essential to institutionalise the language of RHR. Not without resistance and organised activism, recent years of right-wing governments brought a disinvestment in most public policies for women's rights. Some components of the RHR agenda are more mainstreamed, such as fertility regulation, especially hormonal and long term-methods. The limited legal rights to abortion are poorly institutionalised and constantly threatened. Maternal care tends to be highly medicalised and frequently abusive. The covid-19 pandemic accelerated social and public health disruption. The article addresses notions such as reproductive justice and institutional violence, present in the early days of women's health movement, in order to highlight important premises that were diluted in the debate on reproductive rights and autonomy. The historical analysis of how these concepts evolved locally and globally can allow a better understanding of present challenges.
Keyphrases
- public health
- healthcare
- mental health
- global health
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- pregnancy outcomes
- quality improvement
- palliative care
- cervical cancer screening
- health information
- mental illness
- affordable care act
- breast cancer risk
- pregnant women
- health insurance
- type diabetes
- adipose tissue
- risk assessment
- preterm birth
- skeletal muscle
- birth weight