Login / Signup

Trends and Between-Physician Variation in Laboratory Testing: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study in General Practice.

Lisa D SchumacherLevy JägerRahel MeierYael RachaminOliver SennThomas Johannes RosemannStefan Markun
Published in: Journal of clinical medicine (2020)
Laboratory tests are frequently ordered by general practitioners (GPs), but little is known about time trends and between-GP variation of their use. In this retrospective longitudinal study, we analyzed over six million consultations by Swiss GPs during the decade 2009-2018. For 15 commonly used test types, we defined specific laboratory testing rates (sLTR) as the percentage of consultations involving corresponding laboratory testing requests. Patient age- and sex-adjusted time trends of sLTR were modeled with mixed-effect logistic regression accounting for clustering of patients within GPs. We quantified between-GP variation by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Nine out of the 15 laboratory test types considered showed significant temporal increases, most eminently vitamin D (ten-year odds ratio (OR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-2.06) and glycated hemoglobin (ten-year OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.82-1.92). Test types both subject to substantial increase and high between-GP variation of sLTR were vitamin D (ICC 0.075), glycated hemoglobin (ICC 0.101), C-reactive protein (ICC 0.202), and vitamin B12 (ICC 0.166). Increasing testing frequencies and large between-GP variation of specific test type use pointed at inconsistencies of medical practice and potential overuse.
Keyphrases
  • general practice
  • primary care
  • healthcare
  • end stage renal disease
  • ejection fraction
  • chronic kidney disease
  • case report
  • cross sectional
  • quality improvement
  • risk assessment
  • rna seq
  • patient reported