Login / Signup

Systematic review of specialist selection methods with implications for diversity in the medical workforce.

Andrew James AmosKyungmi LeeTarun Sen GuptaBunmi Sherifat Malau-Aduli
Published in: BMC medical education (2021)
The review did not find convincing evidence that measures prioritising reliability drive under-representation of some groups in medical specialties, although this may be due to limited power analyses. In addition, the review did not identify novel specialist selection methods likely to improve diversity. Nevertheless, significant and divergent efforts are being made to promote the evolution of selection processes that draw on all the diverse qualities required for specialist practice serving diverse populations. More rigorous prospective research across different national frameworks will be needed to clarify whether eliminating or reducing the weighting of reliable pre-selection academic results in selection decisions will increase or decrease diversity, and whether drawing on a broader range of assessments can achieve both reliable and socially desirable outcomes.
Keyphrases
  • systematic review
  • palliative care
  • healthcare
  • quality improvement
  • primary care
  • public health
  • randomized controlled trial
  • type diabetes
  • metabolic syndrome
  • adipose tissue
  • insulin resistance
  • genetic diversity