Login / Signup

Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data.

Angela BallantyneAndrew MooreKaren BartholomewNic Aagaard
Published in: PloS one (2020)
This research highlights ways in which RECs and researchers may be talking past each other, resulting in confusion and frustration. These finding provide a platform for realignment of the expectations of RECs and researchers, which could contribute to making research ethics review more effective.
Keyphrases
  • big data
  • public health
  • global health
  • systematic review
  • electronic health record
  • high throughput
  • machine learning
  • artificial intelligence
  • single cell