Login / Signup

Differences between Human and Mouse IgM Fc Receptor (FcµR).

Hiromi KubagawaChristopher M SkopnikKhlowd Al-QaisiRosaleen A CalvertKazuhito HonjoYoshiki KubagawaRuth TeuberPedram Mahmoudi AliabadiPhilipp EnghardAndreas RadbruchBrian J Sutton
Published in: International journal of molecular sciences (2021)
Both non-immune "natural" and antigen-induced "immune" IgM are important for protection against pathogens and for regulation of immune responses to self-antigens. Since the bona fide IgM Fc receptor (FcµR) was identified in humans by a functional cloning strategy in 2009, the roles of FcµR in these IgM effector functions have begun to be explored. In this short essay, we describe the differences between human and mouse FcµRs in terms of their identification processes, cellular distributions and ligand binding activities with emphasis on our recent findings from the mutational analysis of human FcµR. We have identified at least three sites of human FcµR, i.e., Asn66 in the CDR2, Lys79 to Arg83 in the DE loop and Asn109 in the CDR3, responsible for its constitutive IgM-ligand binding. Results of computational structural modeling analysis are consistent with these mutational data and a model of the ligand binding, Ig-like domain of human FcµR is proposed. Serendipitously, substitution of Glu41 and Met42 in the CDR1 of human FcµR with mouse equivalents Gln and Leu, either single or more prominently in combination, enhances both the receptor expression and IgM binding. These findings would help in the future development of preventive and therapeutic interventions targeting FcµR.
Keyphrases
  • endothelial cells
  • pluripotent stem cells
  • induced pluripotent stem cells
  • immune response
  • dendritic cells
  • physical activity
  • electronic health record
  • oxidative stress
  • deep learning
  • big data
  • gram negative