Editorial Commentary: Surgical Videos on YouTube Are Not Peer Reviewed and Have Low Educational Value.
Nichole M PerryJohn J KellyBruce A LevyPublished in: Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association (2024)
The rise of online platforms like YouTube for health information has prompted scrutiny over the quality of medical/surgical-related video content. Recent research on YouTube videos regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with quadriceps tendon autograft shows low educational quality and reliability using established assessment tools. Physicians primarily published content, with longer videos, and physician-generated videos, generally correlating with higher quality. However, YouTube's inadequacy as a reliable source for ACLR information underscores the need for alternative educational resources. Orthopaedic health care professionals must play a pivotal role in guiding patients toward credible sources and take aim at improving online content quality. Understanding patient preferences for online resources is essential for enhancing patient education, the patient-provider relationship, and decision-making in orthopaedic care.
Keyphrases
- health information
- healthcare
- anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- social media
- quality improvement
- primary care
- case report
- end stage renal disease
- emergency department
- newly diagnosed
- palliative care
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- systematic review
- randomized controlled trial
- drinking water
- health insurance
- patient reported outcomes
- clinical evaluation
- anterior cruciate ligament