Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo aortic valve replacement: which procedure for which patient?
Erika HuttNandini MehraMilind Y DesaiPublished in: Expert review of cardiovascular therapy (2022)
With the rising use of TAVR, we will be confronted with more bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration requiring re-intervention. Based on the available evidence and expert consensus, we propose that patients with bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration be treated with ViV TAVR if they have a history of radiation heart disease, prohibitive surgical risk, and multiple sternotomies; while patients with small prostheses, history of infective endocarditis, those at high risk for coronary obstruction, and those with need for other cardiac surgery will be managed with redo SAVR.
Keyphrases
- aortic valve
- aortic valve replacement
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- aortic stenosis
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- cardiac surgery
- randomized controlled trial
- acute kidney injury
- case report
- pulmonary hypertension
- minimally invasive
- coronary artery disease
- coronary artery
- radiation therapy
- mitral valve
- breast cancer risk