Does concomitant tricuspid valve intervention at the time of LVAD placement for patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation lead to improved outcomes compared to isolated LVAD placement?
Ananya MitraAnthony CastleberryMarian UrbanAleem SiddiquePublished in: Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery (2024)
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'In patients with advanced heart failure (HF) and moderate to severe functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement is concomitant tricuspid valve intervention (TVI) superior for the clinical outcomes of survival, right ventricular failure, rehospitalizations for HF, functional status, and quality of life?' Altogether 56 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 papers represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date, country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Our search found no significant clinical benefit for concomitant TVI at the time of LVAD placement. We conclude that patient with moderate-to-severe TR should not routinely undergo concomitant TVI with LVAD placement.
Keyphrases
- aortic valve
- left ventricular assist device
- aortic stenosis
- mitral valve
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- ultrasound guided
- randomized controlled trial
- heart failure
- ejection fraction
- left ventricular
- cardiac surgery
- case report
- coronary artery disease
- early onset
- acute heart failure
- acute kidney injury
- high intensity
- metabolic syndrome
- cardiac resynchronization therapy