Hemostasis in Coronavirus Disease 2019-Lesson from Viscoelastic Methods: A Systematic Review.
Artur SłomkaMariusz KowalewskiEwa ŻekanowskaPublished in: Thrombosis and haemostasis (2021)
Hemostatic unbalance is often observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and patients with severe disease are at high risk of developing thromboembolic complications. Viscoelastic methods (VEMs), including thrombelastography (TEG) and thromboelastometry (TEM), provide data on the nature of hemostatic disturbance. In this systematic review, we assessed the performance of TEG and TEM in the assessment of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with COVID-19. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, medRxiv, and bioRxiv were systematically searched for clinical studies evaluating TEG and/or TEM variables in COVID-19 individuals. Ten studies, with a total of 389 COVID-19 patients, were included, and VEMs were performed in 292 of these patients. Most patients (90%) presented severe COVID-19 and required mechanical ventilation. TEG and TEM variables showed that these patients displayed hypercoagulability and fibrinolysis shutdown, despite the use of appropriate thromboprophylaxis. However, the mechanism underlying these phenomena and their clinical significance in COVID-19 patients who developed thrombosis are still not clear. Further studies are warranted if VEMs might help to identify those at highest risk of thrombotic events and who therefore may derive the greatest benefit from antithrombotic therapy.
Keyphrases
- coronavirus disease
- sars cov
- end stage renal disease
- systematic review
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- mechanical ventilation
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- randomized controlled trial
- stem cells
- public health
- atrial fibrillation
- pulmonary embolism
- high resolution
- early onset
- mass spectrometry
- deep learning
- data analysis
- patient reported
- clinical evaluation