A protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis of thigmotactic behaviour in the open field test in rodent models associated with persistent pain.
Xue Ying ZhangJan VollertEmily S SenaAndrew Sc RiceNadia SolimanPublished in: BMJ open science (2021)
For meta-analysis, we will extract thigmotactic behavioural data and calculate effect sizes. Effect sizes will be combined using a random-effects model. We will assess heterogeneity and identify sources of heterogeneity. A risk-of-bias assessment will be conducted to evaluate study quality. Publication bias will be assessed using funnel plots, Egger's regression and trim-and-fill analysis. We will also extract stimulus-evoked limb withdrawal data to assess its correlation with thigmotaxis in the same animals. The evidence obtained will provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of using thigmotactic outcome measure in animal pain research so that future experimental designs can be optimised. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines and disseminate the review findings through publication and conference presentation.
Keyphrases
- meta analyses
- systematic review
- chronic pain
- randomized controlled trial
- pain management
- electronic health record
- neuropathic pain
- oxidative stress
- single cell
- big data
- adverse drug
- minimally invasive
- anti inflammatory
- spinal cord injury
- machine learning
- drinking water
- current status
- clinical practice
- case report
- data analysis
- case control
- artificial intelligence