Login / Signup

Prediction of future cognitive decline among cognitively unimpaired individuals using measures of soluble phosphorylated tau or tau tangle pathology.

Rik OssenkoppeleGemma SalvadóShorena JanelidzeAlexa Pichet BinetteDivya BaliLinda KarlssonSebastian PalmqvistNiklas Mattsson-CarlgrenErik StomrudJoseph TherriaultNesrine RahmouniPedro Rosa-NetoEmma M CoomansElsmarieke van de GiessenWiesje Maria van der FlierCharlotte E TeunissenErin M JonaitisSterling C Johnsonnull nullSylvia VilleneuveTammie L S BenzingerSuzanne E SchindlerRandell J BatemanJames D DoeckeVincent DoréAzadeh FeizpourColin L MastersChristopher RoweHeather J WisteRonald C PetersenClifford R JackOskar Hansson
Published in: medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences (2024)
Plasma p-tau217 and Tau-PET are strong prognostic biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but their relative performance in predicting future cognitive decline among cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals is unclear. In this head-to-head comparison study including 9 cohorts and 1534 individuals, we found that plasma p-tau217 and medial temporal lobe Tau-PET signal showed similar associations with cognitive decline on a global cognitive composite test (R 2 PET =0.32 vs R 2 PLASMA =0.32, p difference =0.812) and with progression to mild cognitive impairment (Hazard ratio[HR] PET =1.56[1.43-1.70] vs HR PLASMA =1.63[1.50-1.77], p difference =0.627). Combined plasma and PET models were superior to the single biomarker models (R 2 =0.36, p<0.01). Furthermore, sequential selection using plasma p-tau217 and then Tau-PET reduced the number of participants required for a clinical trial by 94%, compared to a 75% reduction when using plasma p-tau217 alone. We conclude that plasma p-tau217 and Tau-PET showed similar performance for predicting future cognitive decline in CU individuals, and their sequential use (i.e., plasma p-tau217 followed by Tau-PET in a subset with high plasma p-tau217) is useful for screening in clinical trials in preclinical AD.
Keyphrases