Login / Signup

The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality.

Julia L HanShreyas GandhiCrystal G BockovenVikram M NarayanPhilippe D Violette
Published in: BJU international (2016)
The number of systematic reviews published in the urology literature has exponentially increased, year by year, but their methodological quality has stagnated. To enhance the validity and impact of systematic reviews, all authors and editors must apply established methodological standards.
Keyphrases
  • systematic review
  • meta analyses
  • quality improvement
  • randomized controlled trial
  • urinary tract
  • single cell