Race-specific FRAX models are evidence-based and support equitable care: a response to the ASBMR Task Force report on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk.
John A KanisNicholas C HarveyMattias LorentzonEnwu LiuMarian SchiniBo AbrahamsenJonathan D AdachiMajed AlokailFredrik BorgstromOlivier BruyèreJohn J CareyPatricia ClarkCyrus CooperElizabeth M CurtisElaine M DennisonManuel Díaz-CurielHans P DimaiDaniel GrigorieMickael HiligsmannPatricia KhashayarWillem LemsE Michael LewieckiRoman S LorencAlexandra PapaioannouJean-Yves ReginsterRené RizzoliEric ShiromaStuart L SilvermanEleanor SimonsickManuel Sosa-HenríquezPawel SzulcKate A WardNoriko YoshimuraHelena JohanssonLiesbeth VandenputEugene V McCloskeynull nullPublished in: Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA (2024)
Task Force on 'Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk' commissioned by the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) Professional Practice Committee has recommended that FRAX® models in the US do not include adjustment for race and ethnicity. This position paper finds that an agnostic model would unfairly discriminate against the Black, Asian and Hispanic communities and recommends the retention of ethnic and race-specific FRAX models for the US, preferably with updated data on fracture and death hazards. In contrast, the use of intervention thresholds based on a fixed bone mineral density unfairly discriminates against the Black, Asian and Hispanic communities in the US. This position of the Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) is endorsed both by the IOF and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).