Why So Slow? Mechanistic Insights from Studies of a Poor Catalyst for Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone.
Daniel E StasiwMukunda MandalBenjamin D NeisenLauren A MitchellChristopher J CramerWilliam B TolmanPublished in: Inorganic chemistry (2016)
Polymerization of ε-caprolactone (CL) using an aluminum alkoxide catalyst (1) designed to prevent unproductive trans binding was monitored at 110 °C in toluene-d8 by 1H NMR and the concentration versus time data fit to a first-order rate expression. A comparison of t1/2 for 1 to values for many other aluminum alkyl and alkoxide complexes shows much lower activity of 1 toward polymerization of CL. Density functional theory calculations were used to understand the basis for the slow kinetics. The optimized geometry of the ligand framework of 1 was found indeed to make CL trans binding difficult: no trans-bound intermediate could be identified as a local minimum. Nor were local minima for cis-bound precomplexes found, suggesting a concerted coordination-insertion for polymer initiation and propagation. The sluggish performance of 1 is attributed to a high-framework distortion energy required to deform the "resting" ligand geometry to that providing optimal catalysis in the corresponding transition-state structure geometry, thus suggesting a need to incorporate ligand flexibility in the design of efficient polymerization catalysts.
Keyphrases
- density functional theory
- ionic liquid
- molecular dynamics
- highly efficient
- visible light
- room temperature
- metal organic framework
- binding protein
- poor prognosis
- reduced graphene oxide
- magnetic resonance
- carbon dioxide
- high resolution
- electronic health record
- dna binding
- molecular dynamics simulations
- case control
- tissue engineering
- transcription factor
- long non coding rna
- deep learning
- data analysis
- transition metal