Login / Signup

Variability in the Spectrum of Reporting on the Schenck KD I Classification in the Orthopaedic Literature: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Joshua S GreenAaron MarcelZachary I LiJay MoranRobert C SchenckMichael J AlaiaMichael J Medvecky
Published in: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine (2024)
The number of true, clinically and/or radiographically confirmed unicruciate KDs was extremely rare, representing <1% of all reported Schenck KD I injuries. A misappropriation of these injury patterns as true KDs may be taking place, affecting outcome studies and potentially biasing published clinical results. An MLKI classification system must document whether a confirmed KD has occurred.
Keyphrases
  • systematic review
  • machine learning
  • deep learning
  • adverse drug
  • case control
  • randomized controlled trial