Efficacy of ICD/CRT-D Remote Monitoring in Patients With HFrEF: a Bayesian Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Ahmad Al-AbdouhMohammed MhannaMohammad As SayaidehMahmoud BarbarawiWaiel AbusninaAhmad JabriHossam Alzu'biAnan Abu RmilahIkram-Ul HaqAshish KumarTaha AhmedErin D MichosGurukripa N KowlgiAbhishek DeshmukhPublished in: Current heart failure reports (2022)
We included 11 trials encompassing 5965 patients. Absolute risk difference (ARD) with 95% credible interval (CrI) was estimated. Pooled (posterior) risk difference was computed using Bayesian hierarchical methods. The ARD for mortality was centered at - 0.01 (95% CrI: - 0.03; 0.01, Tau: 0.02), with an 82% probability of ARD of ICD/CRT-D remote monitoring with respect to control being less than 0. The ARD for cardiovascular mortality was centered at - 0.03 (95% CrI: - 0.11; 0.05, Tau: 0.10), with an 84% probability of ARD of ICD/CRT-D remote monitoring with respect to control being less than 0. ICD/CRT-D remote monitoring in patients with HF is associated with a higher probability of reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared with standard care alone.
Keyphrases
- cardiac resynchronization therapy
- cardiovascular events
- end stage renal disease
- healthcare
- risk factors
- ejection fraction
- systematic review
- palliative care
- chronic kidney disease
- heart failure
- type diabetes
- cerebrospinal fluid
- randomized controlled trial
- cardiovascular disease
- computed tomography
- coronary artery disease
- patient reported outcomes
- health insurance
- acute heart failure
- phase iii