Invasiveness of previous treatment for peripheral arterial disease and risk of adverse cardiac events after coronary stenting.
Tineke H PinxterhuisClemens von BirgelenRobert H GeelkerkenCarine J M DoggenTheo P MentingK Gert van HouwelingenGerard C M LinssenEline H PloumenPublished in: Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics (2024)
Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PADs), undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), have higher adverse event risks. The effect of invasiveness of PADs treatment on PCI outcome is unknown. This study assessed the impact of the invasiveness of previous PADs treatment (invasive or non-invasive) on event risks after PCI with contemporary drug-eluting stents. This post-hoc analysis pooled 3-year patient-level data of PCI all-comer patients living in the eastern Netherlands, previously treated for PADs. PADs included symptomatic atherosclerotic lesion in the lower or upper extremities; carotid or vertebral arteries; mesenteric arteries or aorta. Invasive PADs treatment comprised endarterectomy, bypass surgery, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, stenting or amputation; non-invasive treatment consisted of medication and participation in exercise programs. Primary endpoint was (coronary) target vessel failure: composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target vessel revascularization. Of 461 PCI patients with PADs, information on PADs treatment was available in 357 (77.4%) patients; 249 (69.7%) were treated invasively and 108 (30.3%) non-invasively. Baseline and PCI procedural characteristics showed no between-group difference. Invasiveness of PADs treatment was not associated with adverse event risks, including target vessel failure (20.5% vs. 16.0%; HR: 1.30, 95%-CI 0.75-2.26, p = 0.35), major adverse cardiac events (23.3% vs. 20.4%; HR: 1.16, 95%-CI 0.71-1.90, p = 0.55), and all-cause mortality (12.1% vs. 8.3%; HR: 1.48, 95%-CI 0.70-3.13, p = 0.30). In PADs patients participating in PCI trials, we found no significant relation between the invasiveness of previous PADs treatment and 3-year outcome after PCI. Consequently, high-risk PCI patients can be identified by consulting medical records, searching for PADs, irrespective of the invasiveness of PADs treatment.
Keyphrases
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- coronary artery disease
- end stage renal disease
- acute myocardial infarction
- acute coronary syndrome
- antiplatelet therapy
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- randomized controlled trial
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- healthcare
- coronary artery
- prognostic factors
- machine learning
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- physical activity
- minimally invasive
- high intensity
- social media
- coronary artery bypass
- body composition
- health information
- pulmonary artery
- pulmonary arterial hypertension
- lower limb
- postmenopausal women