Motor-Sparing Effect of Adductor Canal Block for Knee Analgesia: An Updated Review and a Subgroup Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Based on a Corrected Classification System.
Yu-Hsuan Fan ChiangMing-Tse WangShun-Ming ChanSe-Yi ChenMan-Ling WangJin-De HouHsiao-Chien TsaiJui-An LinPublished in: Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) (2023)
By using the corrected classification system, we proved the motor-sparing effect of true ACB compared to FTB. According to the updated ultrasound anatomy, we suggested proximal ACB to be the analgesic technique of choice for knee surgery. Although a single-shot ACB is limited in duration, it remains the candidate of the analgesic standard for knee surgery on postoperative day 1 or 2 because it induces analgesia with less motor involvement in the era of multimodal analgesia. Furthermore, data from the corrected classification system may provide the basis for future research.
Keyphrases
- pain management
- total knee arthroplasty
- minimally invasive
- ultrasound guided
- coronary artery bypass
- knee osteoarthritis
- robot assisted
- anterior cruciate ligament
- postoperative pain
- anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- neuropathic pain
- magnetic resonance imaging
- surgical site infection
- anti inflammatory
- randomized controlled trial
- electronic health record
- spinal cord injury
- computed tomography
- big data
- clinical trial
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- coronary artery disease
- data analysis
- study protocol
- artificial intelligence