A proteomic survival predictor for COVID-19 patients in intensive care.
Vadim DemichevPinkus Tober-LauTatiana NazarenkoOliver LemkeSimran Kaur AulakhHarry J WhitwellAnnika RöhlAnja FreiwaldMirja MittermaierLukasz SzyrwielDaniela LudwigClara Correia-MeloLena Johanna LippertElisa T HelbigPaula StubbemannNadine OlkCharlotte ThibeaultNana-Maria GrüningOleg BlyussSpyros I VernardisMatthew WhiteChristoph B MessnerMichael JoannidisThomas SonnweberSebastian J KleinAlex PizziniYvonne WohlfarterSabina SahanicRichard HilbeBenedikt SchaeferSonja A WagnerFelix MachleidtCarmen GarciaChristoph Ruwwe-GlösenkampTilman LingscheidLaure Bosquillon de JarcyMiriam Songa StegemannMoritz PfeifferLinda JürgensSophy DenkerDaniel ZicklerClaudia SpiesAndreas EdelNils B MüllerPhilipp EnghardAleksej ZelezniakRosa Bellmann-WeilerGünter WeissArchie I CampbellCaroline HaywardDavid J PorteousRiccardo E MarioniAlexander UhrigHeinz ZollerJudith Löffler-RaggMarkus Andreas KellerAmra TancevskiJohn F TimmsAlexey ZaikinStefan HippenstielMichael RamharterHolger Müller-RedetzkyMartin WitzenrathNorbert SuttorpKathryn LilleyMichael MullederLeif-Erik Sandernull nullFlorian KurthMarkus RalserPublished in: PLOS digital health (2022)
Global healthcare systems are challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a need to optimize allocation of treatment and resources in intensive care, as clinically established risk assessments such as SOFA and APACHE II scores show only limited performance for predicting the survival of severely ill COVID-19 patients. Additional tools are also needed to monitor treatment, including experimental therapies in clinical trials. Comprehensively capturing human physiology, we speculated that proteomics in combination with new data-driven analysis strategies could produce a new generation of prognostic discriminators. We studied two independent cohorts of patients with severe COVID-19 who required intensive care and invasive mechanical ventilation. SOFA score, Charlson comorbidity index, and APACHE II score showed limited performance in predicting the COVID-19 outcome. Instead, the quantification of 321 plasma protein groups at 349 timepoints in 50 critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation revealed 14 proteins that showed trajectories different between survivors and non-survivors. A predictor trained on proteomic measurements obtained at the first time point at maximum treatment level (i.e. WHO grade 7), which was weeks before the outcome, achieved accurate classification of survivors (AUROC 0.81). We tested the established predictor on an independent validation cohort (AUROC 1.0). The majority of proteins with high relevance in the prediction model belong to the coagulation system and complement cascade. Our study demonstrates that plasma proteomics can give rise to prognostic predictors substantially outperforming current prognostic markers in intensive care.
Keyphrases
- mechanical ventilation
- sars cov
- healthcare
- clinical trial
- acute respiratory distress syndrome
- coronavirus disease
- intensive care unit
- young adults
- endothelial cells
- mass spectrometry
- machine learning
- label free
- depressive symptoms
- combination therapy
- high resolution
- early onset
- binding protein
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- health insurance
- free survival
- study protocol
- replacement therapy
- pluripotent stem cells
- solid state