Login / Signup

Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods.

Frank George PrestonYanda MengYalin ZhengJames HsuanKevin J HamillAustin G McCormick
Published in: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE (2022)
This study determined the effectiveness of three deidentification methods: use of a) a black box to obscure facial landmarks, b) a letterbox view to display restricted facial landmarks and c) a half letterbox view. Facial images of well-known celebrities were used to create a series of decreasingly deidentified images and displayed to participants in a structured interview session. 55.5% were recognised when all facial features were covered using a black box, leaving only the hair and neck exposed. The letterbox view proved more effective, reaching over 50% recognition only once the periorbital region, eyebrows, and forehead were visible. The half letterbox was the most effective, requiring the nose to be revealed before recognition reached over 50%, and should be the option of choice where appropriate. These findings provide valuable information for informed consent discussions, and we recommend consent to publish forms should stipulate the deidentification method that will be used.
Keyphrases
  • soft tissue
  • randomized controlled trial
  • deep learning
  • systematic review
  • transcription factor
  • optical coherence tomography
  • binding protein
  • healthcare