The geriatric distal femur fracture: nail, plate or both?
Jenna-Leigh WilsonMathieu SquiresMichael McHughJaimo AhnAaron PerdueMark HakePublished in: European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie (2022)
Surgical fixation of distal femur fractures in geriatric patients is an evolving topic. Unlike hip fractures, treatment strategies for distal femur fractures are ill-defined and lack substantive high-quality evidence. With an increasing incidence and an association with significant morbidity and mortality, it is essential to understand existing treatment options and their supporting evidence. Current fixation methods include the use of either retrograde intramedullary nails, or plate and screw constructs. Due to the variability in fracture patterns, the unique anatomy of the distal femur, and the presence or absence or pre-existing implants, decision-making as to which method to use can be challenging. Recent literature has sought to describe the advantages and disadvantages of each, however, there is currently no consensus on a standard of care, and little randomized evidence is available that directly compares intramedullary nails with plating. Future randomized studies comparing intramedullary nails with plating constructs are necessary in order to develop a standard of care based on injury characteristics.
Keyphrases
- minimally invasive
- bone mineral density
- hip fracture
- double blind
- healthcare
- palliative care
- open label
- end stage renal disease
- decision making
- finite element
- placebo controlled
- quality improvement
- chronic kidney disease
- phase iii
- systematic review
- newly diagnosed
- risk factors
- pain management
- prognostic factors
- randomized controlled trial
- affordable care act
- patient reported outcomes
- body composition
- study protocol
- clinical practice