An Interactive Pain Application (MServ) Improves Postoperative Pain Management.
Richard Gordon-WilliamsAndreia TrigoPaul BassettAmanda C de C WilliamsStephen ConeMartin LeesBrigitta BrandnerPublished in: Pain research & management (2021)
We recruited 234 patients to a prospective cohort study into sequential groups in a nonrandomised manner, one day after major thoracic or urological surgery. Group 1 received standard care (SC, n = 102), group 2 were given a multifunctional device that fed back to the nursing staff alone (DN, n = 66), and group 3 were given the same device that fed back to both the nursing staff and the acute pain team (DNPT, n = 66). Patient-reported pain scores at 24 and 48 hours and patient-reported time in severe pain, medications, and satisfaction were recorded on trial discharge. Findings. Odds of having poor pain control (>1 on 0-4 pain scale) were calculated between standard care (SC) and device groups (DN and DNPT). Patients with a device were significantly less likely to have poor pain control at 24 hours (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25, 0.81) and to report time in severe pain at 48 hours (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.80). Patients with a device were three times less likely to be prescribed strong opioids on discharge (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.95). Interpretation. Using an mHealth device designed for pain management, rather than standard care, reduced the incidence of poor pain control in the postoperative period and reduced opioid prescription on discharge from hospital.
Keyphrases
- pain management
- chronic pain
- patient reported
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- patients undergoing
- mental health
- quality improvement
- drug delivery
- chronic kidney disease
- peritoneal dialysis
- randomized controlled trial
- spinal cord injury
- spinal cord
- intensive care unit
- hepatitis b virus
- phase iii
- cancer therapy
- drug induced
- respiratory failure
- patient reported outcomes