Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
Tariq H EnezateJad OmranAshraf S Al-DadahMartin AlpertChristopher J WhiteMazen Abu-FadelHerbert AronowMauricio D CohenFrank AguirreMitul PatelEhtisham MahmudPublished in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2017)
FFR-PCI as compared to ANGIO-PCI is associated with lower in-hospital and follow-up MI and MACE rates. Although, in-hospital TLR was lower in the FFR-PCI group, this benefit was not present after 9 months. FFR-PCI group was also associated with less PCI and lower procedure costs with no effect on procedure time, contrast volume or fluoroscopy time.
Keyphrases
- adverse drug
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- acute myocardial infarction
- coronary artery disease
- acute coronary syndrome
- antiplatelet therapy
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- systematic review
- atrial fibrillation
- emergency department
- coronary artery bypass
- minimally invasive
- computed tomography
- magnetic resonance
- optical coherence tomography
- healthcare
- inflammatory response
- left ventricular
- heart failure
- immune response
- randomized controlled trial
- catheter ablation
- nuclear factor
- acute care