Login / Signup

An evaluation of the structural validity of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) using the Rasch model.

Christina Jerosch-HeroldRachel ChesterLee ShepstoneJoshua I VincentJoy C MacDermid
Published in: Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation (2017)
Rasch Model analysis of the SPADI has identified some strengths and limitations not previously observed using CTT methods. The SPADI should be treated as two separate subscales. The SPADI is a widely used outcome measure in clinical practice and research; however, the scores derived from it must be interpreted with caution. The pain subscale fits the Rasch model expectations well. The disability subscale does not fit the Rasch model and its current format does not meet the criteria for true interval-level measurement required for use as a primary endpoint in clinical trials. Clinicians should therefore exercise caution when interpreting score changes on the disability subscale and attempt to compare their scores to age- and sex-stratified data.
Keyphrases