Login / Signup

Comparison of bibliometrics for predoctoral Translational Science Training (TST) TL1 Program participants and nonparticipants, male and female participants, and participants from underrepresented and well-represented backgrounds.

Christopher Raymond FreiYong-Hee P ChunLinda M McManusJulie BarkerAmanda M Moore
Published in: Journal of clinical and translational science (2022)
Research education and training in Translational Science develops and sustains a workforce to efficiently advance studies designed to improve human health. We evaluated the effectiveness of a Translational Science Training (TST) TL1 Program. Participants had significantly better publications/year, citations/year, h-index , and m-quotient than nonparticipants. Female and male participants, and participants from underrepresented and well-represented backgrounds, performed similarly on all bibliometric assessments. Finally, TST/TL1 Program participants outperformed students from other PhD programs at our institution. This analysis suggests that the TST/TL1 Program has been effective for participants, including those who are female and from underrepresented backgrounds.
Keyphrases
  • public health
  • quality improvement
  • human health
  • healthcare
  • randomized controlled trial
  • risk assessment
  • systematic review
  • virtual reality
  • case control