Login / Signup

Self-preservation strategy for approaching global warming targets in the post-Paris Agreement era.

Yi-Ming WeiRong HanCe WangBiying YuQiao-Mei LiangXiao-Chen YuanJunjie ChangQingyu ZhaoHua LiaoBaojun TangJinyue YanLijing ChengZili Yang
Published in: Nature communications (2020)
A strategy that informs on countries' potential losses due to lack of climate action may facilitate global climate governance. Here, we quantify a distribution of mitigation effort whereby each country is economically better off than under current climate pledges. This effort-sharing optimizing approach applied to a 1.5 °C and 2 °C global warming threshold suggests self-preservation emissions trajectories to inform NDCs enhancement and long-term strategies. Results show that following the current emissions reduction efforts, the whole world would experience a washout of benefit, amounting to almost 126.68-616.12 trillion dollars until 2100 compared to 1.5 °C or well below 2 °C commensurate action. If countries are even unable to implement their current NDCs, the whole world would lose more benefit, almost 149.78-791.98 trillion dollars until 2100. On the contrary, all countries will be able to have a significant positive cumulative net income before 2100 if they follow the self-preservation strategy.
Keyphrases
  • climate change
  • human health
  • depressive symptoms
  • physical activity
  • healthcare
  • public health
  • municipal solid waste
  • risk assessment
  • life cycle
  • global health