Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management.
Bruno GiraudeauAgnès CailleSandra M EldridgeCharles WeijerMerrick ZwarensteinMonica TaljaardPublished in: BMC medicine (2022)
Heterogeneity in centres and patients should be welcomed rather than limited. Interventions can be flexible or tailored and control interventions are expected to reflect usual care, avoiding use of a placebo. Co-interventions should be allowed; adherence should not be enforced. All these elements introduce heterogeneity in interventions (experimental or control), which has to be welcomed because it mimics reality. Outcomes should be objective and possibly routinely collected; standardised assessment, blinding and adjudication should be avoided as much as possible because this is not how assessment would be done outside a trial setting. The statistical analysis strategy must be guided by the objective to inform decision-making, thus favouring the intention-to-treat principle. Pragmatic trials should consider including process analyses to inform an understanding of the trial results. Needed data to conduct these analyses should be collected unobtrusively. Finally, ethical principles must be respected, even though this may seem to conflict with goals of pragmatism; consent procedures could be incorporated in the flow of care.
Keyphrases
- study protocol
- physical activity
- clinical trial
- decision making
- phase iii
- healthcare
- single cell
- palliative care
- end stage renal disease
- open label
- randomized controlled trial
- double blind
- phase ii
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- quality improvement
- pain management
- prognostic factors
- placebo controlled
- metabolic syndrome
- machine learning
- drinking water
- affordable care act
- glycemic control