Alternative payment models for durable and potentially curative therapies: The case of gene therapy for haemophilia A.
Clifford GoodmanErik BerntorpOlivier Wongnull nullPublished in: Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia (2022)
Gene therapies for haemophilia are among the emerging durable and potentially curative cell and gene therapies with high price tags that are challenging conventional payment systems. These therapies present clinical and economic uncertainties for payers, providers, patients, and manufacturers, including regarding expression of the intended physiological response, duration of treatment effect, patient outcomes, potentially high upfront costs and variable additional costs, and uptake among potentially indicated, diverse patient subgroups. These uncertainties raise interest among payers, manufacturers, and providers in risk-sharing arrangements, including alternative payment models (APMs) such as various outcomes-based and finance-based models. This paper describes a taxonomy of APMs. Then, for the particular context of gene therapy for haemophilia A, we present a set of factors to be considered when determining whether an APM risk-sharing arrangement may be appropriate for a given gene therapy, and, if so, which APM may be most suitable. [Correction added on 21 February 2022, after first online publication: the 'Key Points of Consideration' have been added in this version.].
Keyphrases
- gene therapy
- prognostic factors
- copy number
- genome wide
- health information
- social media
- health insurance
- end stage renal disease
- genome wide identification
- ejection fraction
- poor prognosis
- single cell
- case report
- peritoneal dialysis
- stem cells
- dna methylation
- healthcare
- cell therapy
- patient reported outcomes
- mesenchymal stem cells
- replacement therapy
- combination therapy