Routine Functional Testing or Standard Care in High-Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Nouman ArshadIndah SukmawatiUpul WickramarachchiShrilla BanerjeeFathima Aaysha CaderPublished in: Current cardiology reports (2024)
The most recent pragmatic POST-PCI trial provided randomized evidence showing that routine functional stress testing post-PCI did not lead to a reduction in 2-year ischemic cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality, as compared to a symptom-guided standard-of-care approach. This was also true for sub-analyses including multivessel or left main disease, diabetics, as well as following imaging or physiology guided PCI. In the absence of a change in their clinical or functional status suggestive of stent failure, post-PCI routine periodic stress testing in stable patients on guideline-directed medical therapy is currently not recommended by American clinical practice guidelines. While evidence on the cost-effectiveness of routine stress testing strategy is scarce, physician, payer, and policy-level interventions to reduce inappropriate use of routine functional testing need to be addressed.
Keyphrases
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- coronary artery disease
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- cardiovascular events
- acute myocardial infarction
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- acute coronary syndrome
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- antiplatelet therapy
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- clinical practice
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- atrial fibrillation
- prognostic factors
- public health
- peritoneal dialysis
- study protocol
- emergency department
- randomized controlled trial
- cardiovascular disease
- skeletal muscle
- stress induced
- photodynamic therapy
- high resolution
- adipose tissue
- bone marrow
- heart failure
- coronary artery bypass
- double blind
- affordable care act
- placebo controlled
- glycemic control
- fluorescence imaging