Login / Signup

Randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of low dose dexamethasone oral mini-pulse versus diphenylcyclopropenone contact sensitisation in severe pediatric alopecia areata.

Rahul MahajanManju DaroachSanjeev HandaDipankar De
Published in: Dermatologic therapy (2022)
Oral mini pulse (OMP) corticosteroids and diphencyclopropenone (DPCP) contact sensitisation are commonly used treatment modalities in severe cases of Alopecia areata (AA) in children but with scarce studies comparing the two modalities in children. In this study we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of dexamethasone OMP with DPCP contact sensitization in severe non progressive AA in children. This randomized open label study was undertaken in 30 children less than 18 years of age with extensive non progressive AA divided in two groups. Group I included 15 patients who received dexamethasone (5 mg/week) OMP as five tablets of 0.5 mg dexamethasone (i.e., 2.5 mg dexamethasone) on two consecutive days in a week. Group II included 15 patients who were treated with DPCP contact sensitization. The treatment was continued in all patients for 24 weeks. Patients were followed up every 4 weeks and records were maintained. Response rate was 100% in OMP group and 53.3% in DPCP group at 24 weeks. In Group I, complete regrowth was seen in 20% patients, and cosmetically acceptable regrowth in 66.7% while in Group II, complete regrowth was not seen in any of the patients, and cosmetically acceptable regrowth in 20% (p = 0.001). Hair regrowth started at mean duration of 7.7 weeks in Group I, while 11.3 weeks in Group II. Response rate of treatment with dexamethasone OMP leads to a significantly faster and better hair regrowth compared to DPCP contact immunotherapy in non-progressive extensive AA in children.
Keyphrases