Publication bias in diagnostic imaging: conference abstracts with positive conclusions are more likely to be published.
Lee TreanorRobert A FrankLindsay A CherpakAna Dehmoobad SharifabadiJean-Paul SalamehZachary HallgrimsonNicholas FabianoTrevor A McGrathNoemie KraaijpoelJason YaoDaniel A KorevaarPatrick M BossuytMatthew D F McInnesPublished in: European radiology (2020)
• Imaging diagnostic test accuracy conference abstracts with positive conclusions were more likely to be reported as full-text articles than those with non-positive conclusions. • The majority (75%) of imaging diagnostic test accuracy conference abstracts with positive conclusions were published, compared with only 53% and 33% with neutral and negative conclusions, respectively. • Conclusion positivity remained associated with the full-text publication of conference abstracts when controlling for multiple potential confounding variables.