Login / Signup

Quality appraisal of systematic reviews on methods of labour induction: a systematic review.

Ryan ChowAllen LiNicole WuMorgan MartinJocelyn M WesselsWarren G Foster
Published in: Archives of gynecology and obstetrics (2021)
Methodological quality for systematic reviews on the induction of labour were ranked as moderate with no significant changes in quality over the past 2 decades. Publication characteristics are not significantly associated with methodological quality, indicating that healthcare professionals should critically appraise studies before applying them to practice.
Keyphrases
  • systematic review
  • quality improvement
  • healthcare
  • randomized controlled trial
  • high intensity
  • meta analyses