Factors Affecting Poultry Producers' Attitudes towards Biosecurity.
Arthi AmalrajHilde Van MeirhaegheAnne-Christine LefortNathalie RoussetJustine GrilletAnnick SpaansAitor DevesaSandra Sevilla-NavarroGiuditta TilliAlessandra PiccirilloArtur ŻbikowskiLászló KovácsMária Kovács-WeberIlias ChantziarasJeroen DewulfPublished in: Animals : an open access journal from MDPI (2024)
Poultry producers' attitudes towards biosecurity practices were assessed by using the ADKAR ® (Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement) behavioral change model. Conventional poultry producers ( n = 155) from different production types including broilers ( n = 35), layers ( n = 22), breeders ( n = 24), turkeys ( n = 19), ducks ( n = 23), free-range broilers ( n = 11), free-range layers ( n = 11), and hatcheries ( n = 10) from seven European countries were scored for each ADKAR element (1 = total absence to 5 = perfect fulfilment). Each country performed selected interventions (e.g., coaching, participatory meetings, etc.) to improve biosecurity compliance. After the interventions, significant change was observed in three of the four attitude elements. The overall mean scores (x¯ ± SD) obtained during the initial assessment ( n = 130) were 4.2 ± 0.6 for Awareness, 4.1 ± 0.7 for Desire, 3.8 ± 0.8 for Knowledge, and 4.0 ± 0.7 for Ability, whereas after intervention, the scores were A = 4.3 ± 0.6, D = 4.2 ± 0.7, K = 4.1 ± 0.7, and Ab = 4.1 ± 0.7. The Reinforcement component was only evaluated after the change and obtained a score of 3.7 ± 0.7 on average. Identifying the elements influencing poultry producers and their behavior related to farm management decisions was useful in guiding our educational interventions to effectively change their behavior.