Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making.
Desmond CurranEliazar Sabater CabreraLinda M NelsenPublished in: Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics (2021)
The development and demand for effective vaccines have witnessed an exponential growth over the last century. In the meantime, the vaccine market involves more knowledgeable stakeholders, with a shift in emphasis by regulatory agencies on understanding the patient perception and experience. The Food and Drug Administration's publication of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) guidance has elevated the discipline of PROs and has resulted in a transition from clinician reports of patient outcomes to PROs. This review reports various research methods, which utilize PROs, including qualitative and quantitative research, clinical trials, and patient preference studies. With the advancement of electronic PRO data capture, additional advantages of PROs are being observed and utilized (e.g. as a trigger for clinical endpoints). We discuss uses and advantages of including PROs into the clinical trial program to improve efficiencies, clinical relevance and overall validity of the program in the vaccine field. (See Plain Language Summary).
Keyphrases
- patient reported outcomes
- clinical trial
- decision making
- case report
- quality improvement
- drug administration
- anti inflammatory
- phase ii
- randomized controlled trial
- systematic review
- open label
- autism spectrum disorder
- high resolution
- transcription factor
- electronic health record
- emergency department
- study protocol
- double blind
- machine learning
- health insurance
- mass spectrometry
- human health
- artificial intelligence