Login / Signup

Exploring the ecological validity and variability of a 10-min bout of wheeling.

Megan K MacGillivrayTania LamMarc KlimstraE Paul ZehrBonita J Sawatzky
Published in: Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology (2017)
Using able-bodied participants to represent manual wheelchair users performing a 10-min wheeling trial is not ecologically valid and caution should be used when interpreting push angle and forces applied to the pushrim. Considering that push angle was the only variable that demonstrated a main effect of time, long durations (e.g., 10 min) of wheeling may be appropriate for use in study designs acknowledging potential changes in wheeling strategy and push angle. Implications for Rehabilitation Some experienced wheelchair users and non-wheelchair users modify their movement pattern from an arc to a circular pattern within a 10-min wheeling trial. There are clear biomechanical differences in push angle and forces applied to the pushrim between wheelchair users with experience and able-bodied non-wheelchair users. Able-bodied participants who have no prior manual wheeling experience are no more variable than long-term wheelchair users. Variability may play an important role in wheelchair propulsion.
Keyphrases
  • high resolution
  • clinical trial
  • study protocol
  • phase iii
  • randomized controlled trial
  • climate change
  • phase ii
  • double blind