Statistical design of Phase II/III clinical trials for testing therapeutic interventions in COVID-19 patients.
Shesh Nath RaiChen QianJianmin PanAnand SethDeo Kumar SrivastavaAruni BhatnagarPublished in: BMC medical research methodology (2020)
We recommend using a binary outcome with composite endpoints for patients in Stage 3, 4 or 5 with a power of 90% to detect an improvement of 20% in the response rate, and a 30 day mortality rate outcome for those in Stage 6 or 7 with a power of 90% to detect 15% (effect size) reduction in mortality rate. For the intermediate-risk group, two interim analyses for efficacy evaluation along with toxicity monitoring are encouraged. For the high-risk group, two interim analyses without toxicity monitoring is advised.
Keyphrases
- phase ii
- clinical trial
- end stage renal disease
- open label
- cardiovascular events
- ejection fraction
- oxidative stress
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- sars cov
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- risk factors
- phase iii
- type diabetes
- coronary artery disease
- randomized controlled trial
- study protocol
- patient reported outcomes