COVID-19 and Laparoscopic Surgery: Scoping Review of Current Literature and Local Expertise.
Robert Adrianus de LeeuwNicole Birgit BurgerMarcello CeccaroniJian ZhangJurriaan B TuynmanMohamed MabroukPere Barri SoldevilaHendrik Jaap BonjerPim AnkumJudith A F HuirnePublished in: JMIR public health and surveillance (2020)
There seems to be consensus in the literature that intubation and extubation are high-risk procedures for health care providers and that maximum protective equipment is needed. On the other hand, minimal evidence is available of the actual risk of contamination of health care providers during laparoscopy itself, nor of operating room pressure, surgical smoke, tissue extraction, or CO2 deflation. However, new studies are being published daily from current experiences, and society statements are continuously updated. There seems to be no reason to abandon laparoscopic surgery in favor of open surgery. However, the risks should not be underestimated, surgery should be performed on patients with COVID-19 only when necessary, and health care providers should use logic and common sense to protect themselves and others by performing surgery in a safe and protected environment.
Keyphrases
- laparoscopic surgery
- minimally invasive
- healthcare
- coronary artery bypass
- systematic review
- surgical site infection
- coronavirus disease
- randomized controlled trial
- cardiac arrest
- risk assessment
- human health
- cardiac surgery
- mental health
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- social media
- coronary artery disease
- climate change
- clinical practice
- heavy metals
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus