Login / Signup

Are antifungal non-inferiority trials at risk of eroding effectiveness because of bio-creep? A secondary analysis of a systematic review.

Adam S KomorowskiAnthony D BaiAnna CvetkovicOmar MouradCarson K L LoXena X LiVaibhav MokashiAidan FindlaterDonald Brody DuncanCharlotte FullerDaniela L LetoDeborah YamamuraDominik Mertz
Published in: Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy (2021)
Non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) effectiveness may erode when results favour the active control over time, and when a decreasingly effective control arm is used in serial trials. We analyzed 32 antifungal noninferiority RCTs (NI-RCTs) for these scenarios in this secondary analysis of a systematic review. Our exploratory analysis suggests that the erosion risk in the effectiveness of antifungal non-inferiority trials is uncommon. Findings are limited by small sample size, and overall risk of bias.
Keyphrases
  • randomized controlled trial
  • candida albicans
  • systematic review
  • study protocol
  • climate change
  • clinical trial
  • metal organic framework