Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation or Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Renal Impairment: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis.
Zhe WangQian XiangKun HuXiaodan ZhangQiufen XieZhiyan LiuYi Min CuiPublished in: American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions (2021)
In the systematic review and meta-analysis, for AF or VTE patients with RI, direct oral anticoagulants performed comparably to or better than warfarin with regard to safety and effects. The network meta-analysis indicated that for patients with mild RI, apixaban might be safer for patients with a lower risk of ischemic events, while rivaroxaban might be suitable for patients with a lower risk of bleeding events. For patients with moderate RI, apixaban could reduce the risk of ischemic events without increasing the risk of bleeding events. For AF patients with severe RI, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin showed a similar effect. These results might provide suggestions for clinical arterial and venous thrombosis prevention.
Keyphrases
- direct oral anticoagulants
- atrial fibrillation
- venous thromboembolism
- systematic review
- meta analyses
- oral anticoagulants
- catheter ablation
- left atrial
- left atrial appendage
- heart failure
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- randomized controlled trial
- ischemia reperfusion injury
- high intensity
- mitral valve
- cerebral ischemia
- oxidative stress
- blood brain barrier
- acute coronary syndrome
- coronary artery disease
- pulmonary embolism