How do network meta-analyses address intransitivity when assessing certainty of evidence: a systematic survey.
Ying WangRuyu XiaTina Poklepovic PericicGeertruida E BekkeringLiangying HouMalgorzata M BalaJinhui TianMichael WuDavid GlossReed Alexander Cunningham SiemieniukYu Tong FeiBram RochwergGordon GuyattRomina Brignardello-PetersenPublished in: BMJ open (2023)
A third of systematic reviews with NMAs using the GRADE approach rated down for intransitivity. Limitations in reporting of methods to address intransitivity proved considerable. Whether the problem is that reviewers neglected to address rating down for transitivity at all, or whether they did consider but not report, is not clear. At minimum systematic reviews with NMAs need to improve their reporting practices regarding intransitivity; it may well be that they need to improve their practice in transitivity assessment. How to best address intransitivity may remain unclear for many reviewers thus additional GRADE guidance providing practical instructions for addressing intransitivity may be desirable.