Login / Signup

Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and the CoronaVac vaccines and boosters in healthcare workers.

Hazal Cansu ÇulpanSümeyye Nur AydınAbdulkerim UygurUğurcan SayılıErkam ŞekerI Lker İnanç BalkanRidvan KaraaliBeyhan BudakYilmaz KeskindemirciNeşe SaltoğluGunay Can
Published in: Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics (2023)
The evidence on the waning protection of COVID-19 vaccines has been reviewed by the World Health Organization and has led to consideration of the need for booster doses. This study aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19, and the COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers who received various types (inactive or m-RNA) and doses (2 to 4 doses) of the COVID-19 vaccine. The study was conducted with a total of 3,009 healthcare workers between August 1 and November 30, 2021 at a university hospital. Six different vaccination statuses were evaluated in the study. The effectiveness for COVID-19 infection, after adjusting for age, sex, and position, was highest in those who received two doses of CoronaVac and two doses of BNT162b2 (89.3%, 95% CI 72.2-95.9%) and was lowest in those who received two doses of CoronaVac (29%, 95% CI - 8-53%). The adjusted effectiveness of two doses of CoronaVac for COVID-19 infection was not significant (21.0%, 95% CI - 20.7-48.3%) but increased significantly with a booster dose of CoronaVac or BNT162b2. One or two doses of the BNT162b2 booster demonstrated higher effectiveness in comparison to a single dose of the CoronaVac booster. These results indicate the need for a booster dose, and heterologous boosting with BNT162b2 may be a better option for higher effectiveness for those who received two doses of CoronaVac. Future studies should evaluate the need for further booster doses and their long-term effects.
Keyphrases
  • randomized controlled trial
  • coronavirus disease
  • sars cov
  • systematic review
  • nucleic acid