Do protocols for new randomised trials take previous similar trials into account? Cohort study of contemporary trial protocols.
Asger Sand Paludan-MüllerMichelle C OgdenMikkel MarquardsenJonas ViveKarsten Juhl JørgensenPeter Christian GøtzschePublished in: BMJ open (2019)
While most protocols seem to adequately consider existing evidence, a substantial minority of trials might lack a sufficient evidence base. Very few trials seemed to have been based on a literature search which makes it impossible to know whether all relevant previous trials had been considered. Rules for ethical approval should include requirements for systematic literature searches to ensure that research participants are not exposed to sub-optimal treatments or unnecessary harms as well as to reduce research waste.