This article discusses the paradox of exclusion/inclusion: U.S. health policy prohibits Latinos who fall under certain classifications from accessing health services and insurance yet permits them to be "human subjects" in health research. We aim to advance the discussion of health research ethics post the Tuskegee syphilis experiment in Latinos by (a) tracing the impacts of policy exclusion and the social context of anti-Latino sentiment on Latinos' low participation rates in health research and inequitable access to treatment modalities; (b) challenging researchers to address social sources of vulnerabilities; and (c) offering recommendations on adapting a social justice ethical stance to address these challenges, which are part of the Tuskegee Study legacy.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- public health
- mental health
- mental illness
- endothelial cells
- global health
- health insurance
- health information
- physical activity
- big data
- drinking water
- hepatitis c virus
- affordable care act
- risk assessment
- deep learning
- climate change
- african american
- decision making
- induced pluripotent stem cells
- replacement therapy