Anabolic Agents for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: How Do You Choose?
Felicia CosmanDavid W DempsterPublished in: Current osteoporosis reports (2021)
Studies over the last decade have shown that anabolic agents produce faster and larger effects against fracture than antiresorptive agents. Furthermore, trials evaluating anabolic antiresorptive treatment sequences have shown that anabolic first treatment strategies produce the greatest benefits to bone density, particularly in the hip region. However, there are no head-to-head evaluations of the three anabolic therapies with fracture outcomes or bone density, and these studies are not likely to occur. How to decide which agent to use at which time in a woman's life is unknown. We review the most significant clinical trials of anabolic agents which have assessed fracture, areal or volumetric bone density, microarchitecture, and/or bone strength, as well as information gleaned from histomorphometry studies to provide a rationale for consideration of one agent vs another in various clinical settings. There is no definitive answer to this question; all three agents increase bone strength and reduce fracture risk rapidly. Since the postmenopausal lifespan could be as long as 40-50 years, it is likely that very high-risk women will utilize different anabolic agents at different points in their lives.
Keyphrases
- bone mineral density
- postmenopausal women
- clinical trial
- body composition
- soft tissue
- bone loss
- bone regeneration
- healthcare
- hip fracture
- squamous cell carcinoma
- case control
- type diabetes
- randomized controlled trial
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- weight loss
- case report
- health information
- placebo controlled
- combination therapy