Login / Signup

Differential genetic influences over colorectal cancer risk and gene expression in large bowel mucosa.

Peter G Vaughan-ShawMaria N TimofeevaLi-Yin OoiVictoria SvintiGraeme GrimesClaire SmillieJames P BlackmurKevin DonnellyEvi TheodoratouHarry CampbellLina ZgagaFarhat V N DinSusan M FarringtonMalcolm G Dunlop
Published in: International journal of cancer (2021)
Site-specific variation in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, biology and prognosis are poorly understood. We sought to determine whether common genetic variants influencing CRC risk might exhibit topographical differences on CRC risk through regional differences in effects on gene expression in the large bowel mucosa. We conducted a site-specific genetic association study (10 630 cases, 31 331 controls) to identify whether established risk variants exert differential effects on risk of proximal, compared to distal CRC. We collected normal colorectal mucosa and blood from 481 subjects and assessed mucosal gene expression using Illumina HumanHT-12v4 arrays in relation to germline genotype. Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) were explored by anatomical location of sampling. The rs3087967 genotype (chr11q23.1 risk variant) exhibited significant site-specific effects-risk of distal CRC (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20, P = 8.20 × 10-20 ) with negligible effects on proximal CRC risk (OR = 1.05, P = .10). Expression of 1261 genes differed between proximal and distal colonic mucosa (top hit PRAC gene, fold-difference = 10, P = 3.48 × 10-57 ). In eQTL studies, rs3087967 genotype was associated with expression of 8 cis- and 21 trans-genes. Four of these (AKAP14, ADH5P4, ASGR2, RP11-342M1.7) showed differential effects by site, with strongest trans-eQTL signals in proximal colonic mucosa (eg, AKAP14, beta = 0.61, P = 5.02 × 10-5 ) and opposite signals in distal mucosa (AKAP14, beta = -0.17, P = .04). In summary, genetic variation at the chr11q23.1 risk locus imparts greater risk of distal rather than proximal CRC and exhibits site-specific differences in eQTL effects in normal mucosa. Topographical differences in genomic control over gene expression relevant to CRC risk may underlie site-specific variation in CRC. Results may inform individualised CRC screening programmes.
Keyphrases
  • gene expression
  • genome wide
  • poor prognosis
  • copy number
  • minimally invasive
  • risk factors
  • binding protein
  • mass spectrometry