Global sensitivity analysis of clinical trials with missing patient-reported outcomes.
Daniel O ScharfsteinAidan McDermottPublished in: Statistical methods in medical research (2018)
Randomized trials with patient-reported outcomes are commonly plagued by missing data. The analysis of such trials relies on untestable assumptions about the missing data mechanism. To address this issue, it has been recommended that the sensitivity of the trial results to assumptions should be a mandatory reporting requirement. In this paper, we discuss a recently developed methodology (Scharfstein et al., Biometrics, 2018) for conducting sensitivity analysis of randomized trials in which outcomes are scheduled to be measured at fixed points in time after randomization and some subjects prematurely withdraw from study participation. The methodology is explicated in the context of a placebo-controlled randomized trial designed to evaluate a treatment for bipolar disorder. We present a comprehensive data analysis and a simulation study to evaluate the performance of the method. A software package entitled SAMON (R and SAS versions) that implements our methods is available at www.missingdatamatters.org .
Keyphrases
- patient reported outcomes
- data analysis
- bipolar disorder
- clinical trial
- phase ii
- phase iii
- study protocol
- electronic health record
- placebo controlled
- double blind
- major depressive disorder
- physical activity
- randomized controlled trial
- open label
- skeletal muscle
- adverse drug
- deep learning
- adipose tissue
- glycemic control
- smoking cessation