Real-world healthcare resource utilization and costs of weekly versus every-2-week cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chris P PescottEmmanuelle BoutmyMichael BatechPhilippe RongaFrancois-Xavier LamyPublished in: Journal of comparative effectiveness research (2021)
Aim: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare costs (HC) for every-2-week (Q2W) versus weekly (Q1W) cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients & methods: Patients with mCRC receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy in a line-agnostic setting. Cohort study of patients with mCRC treated with cetuximab and chemotherapy in IBM MarketScan. Analyses were weighted by inverse probability of treatment based on propensity score. Results: HRU was numerically lower with the Q2W versus Q1W regimen (weighted mean, 8.1 vs 9.5 encounters per-patient-per-month). The weighted average of HC was $17,653 and $16,469 per-patient-per-month for the Q2W and Q1W regimens, respectively; the difference between regimens decreased when restricting to CRC-related claims. Conclusion: HRU was lower and HC were similar between the Q2W and Q1W regimens.
Keyphrases
- metastatic colorectal cancer
- healthcare
- magnetic resonance
- newly diagnosed
- contrast enhanced
- locally advanced
- end stage renal disease
- case report
- network analysis
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- clinical trial
- magnetic resonance imaging
- prognostic factors
- randomized controlled trial
- rectal cancer
- computed tomography
- health information
- study protocol
- placebo controlled
- combination therapy
- chemotherapy induced
- patient reported