Login / Signup

Rivaroxaban for the prevention of outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: an indirect comparison of national and international registries.

Francisco MarínMarcelo Sanmartín FernándezIñaki LekuonaFernando ArribasGonzalo Barón-EsquiviasVivencio BarriosJuan Cosín SalesRomán Freixa-PamiasJaime Masjuan VallejoAlejandro Isidoro Pérez CabezaVanessa Roldán SchillingJosé Manuel Vázquez RodríguezCarles Rafols PriuManuel Anguita Sánchez
Published in: Journal of comparative effectiveness research (2022)
Objective: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: The clinical profile and outcomes of the EMIR study were indirectly compared with those of ROCKET-AF, eight other Spanish observational studies and XANTUS. Results: In EMIR, mean age was 74.2 years and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc was 3.5. In the rivaroxaban arm of the ROCKET-AF trial, mean age was 73 years and CHADS 2 was 3.5, whereas in the Spanish studies mean age ranged from 74.9 years to 78.4 years and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc from 3.5 to 4.3. In EMIR, rates of stroke/systemic embolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death and major bleeding were 0.57, 1.07, 0.63 and 1.04 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In ROCKET-AF, these numbers were 1.7, 3.91, 1.53 and 3.6 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In the Spanish studies, rates of stroke and major bleeding were 0-1.8 and 0.22-4.2 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In XANTUS, rates of stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding were 0.7, 1.8 and 2.1 events/100 patient-years, respectively. Conclusion: Despite the fact that rivaroxaban is prescribed for elderly patients with a high thromboembolic risk, rates of outcomes remain low.
Keyphrases