Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on esophageal cancer surgery in Northern Italy: lessons learned from a multicentric snapshot.
Fabrizio RebecchiSimone ArolfoElettra UglionoMario MorinoEmanuele AstiLuigi BonavinaFelice BorghiAndrea CorattiAndrea CossuGiovanni De ManzoniStefano De PascaleGiovanni Carlo FerrariUberto Fumagalli RomarioSimone GiacopuzziMonica GualtierottiMassimo GuglielmettiStefano MeriglianoGiovanni PallabazzerPaolo PariseAndrea PeriAndrea PietrabissaRiccardo RosatiStefano SantiAngela TribuziMichele ValmasoniJacopo ViganòJacopo WeindelmayerPublished in: Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus (2021)
Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) outbreak has significantly burdened healthcare systems worldwide, leading to reorganization of healthcare services and reallocation of resources. The Italian Society for Study of Esophageal Diseases (SISME) conducted a national survey to evaluate changes in esophageal cancer management in a region severely struck by COVID-19 pandemic. A web-based questionnaire (26 items) was sent to 12 SISME units. Short-term outcomes of esophageal resections performed during the lockdown were compared with those achieved in the same period of 2019. Six (50%) centers had significant restrictions in their activity. However, overall number of resections did not decrease compared to 2019, while a higher rate of open esophageal resections was observed (40 vs. 21.7%; P = 0.034). Surgery was delayed in 24 (36.9%) patients in 6 (50%) centers, mostly due to shortage of anesthesiologists, and occupation of intensive care unit beds from intubated COVID-19 patients. Indications for neoadjuvant chemo (radio) therapy were extended in 14% of patients. Separate COVID-19 hospital pathways were active in 11 (91.7%) units. COVID-19 screening protocols included nasopharyngeal swab in 91.7%, chest computed tomography scan in 8.3% and selective use of lung ultrasound in 75% of units. Postoperative interstitial pneumonia occurred in 1 (1.5%) patient. Recovery from COVID-19 pandemic was characterized by screening of patients in all units, and follow-up outpatient visits in only 33% of units. This survey shows that clinical strategies differed considerably among the 12 SISME centers. Evidence-based guidelines are needed to support the surgical esophageal community and to standardize clinical practice in case of further pandemics.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- coronavirus disease
- computed tomography
- intensive care unit
- end stage renal disease
- sars cov
- ejection fraction
- minimally invasive
- clinical practice
- emergency department
- prognostic factors
- squamous cell carcinoma
- photodynamic therapy
- lymph node
- coronary artery disease
- cross sectional
- case report
- locally advanced
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- atrial fibrillation
- health information
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- combination therapy