Login / Signup

The origin of Vierordt's law: The experimental protocol matters.

Stefan GlasauerZhuanghua Shi
Published in: PsyCh journal (2021)
In 1868, Karl Vierordt discovered one type of errors in time perception-an overestimation of short duration and underestimation of long durations, known as Vierordt's law. Here we reviewed the original study in its historical context and asked whether Vierordt's law is a result of an unnatural experimental randomization protocol. Using iterative Bayesian updating, we simulated the original results with high accuracy. Importantly, the model also predicted that a slowly changing random-walk sequence produces less central tendency than a random sequence with the same durations. This was validated by a duration reproduction experiment from two sequences (random and random walk) with the same sampled distribution. The results showed that trial-wise variation influenced the magnitude of Vierordt's law. We concluded that Vierordt's law is caused by an unnatural yet widely used experimental protocol.
Keyphrases
  • randomized controlled trial
  • clinical trial
  • study protocol
  • working memory
  • patient safety
  • magnetic resonance
  • phase iii
  • image quality
  • amino acid
  • open label
  • adverse drug
  • phase ii